Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study of penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery with Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis in ocular trauma versus non-trauma patients

  • Trauma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of temporary keratoprosthesis combined with vitreoretinal surgery and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with or without trauma.

Methods

This retrospective study included 49 eyes in 49 non-trauma patients and 51 eyes in 48 ocular trauma patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery with Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis between 2009 and 2016, with a follow-up of at least 12 months. Study variables included previous corneal, glaucoma, or retinal surgeries; various intraoperative surgical maneuvers; lens status; vitreoretinal and corneal pathology; functional outcomes; anatomical retinal reattachment; graft clarity; and need for glaucoma surgery or treatment.

Results

The mean age was 56 years in the non-trauma group and 42 years in the ocular trauma group. A total of 45% of the non-trauma cases and 24% of the ocular trauma cases had a single functional eye. Pseudophakic and aphakic keratopathy was diagnosed in 41% of the non-trauma group and corneal laceration in 65% of the ocular trauma group. In the ocular trauma group, injuries were open globe injury in 78%, closed globe injury in 12%, and intraocular foreign body in 10%. Retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy was present in 39% of patients in the non-trauma group and in 35% of the ocular trauma group. Improvement or stability of visual acuity was higher among ocular trauma patients (86%) than in non-trauma patients (78%). The rate of clear corneal grafts was 49% in both groups. Retinal attachment was achieved in 90% and 78% of patients in the non-trauma and ocular trauma groups, respectively. The use of retinotomy had a positive influence on the final attached retina (p = 0.016). The placement of a scleral buckle significantly increased the risk of glaucoma (p = 0.004). Poor functional outcome was related to persistent retinal detachment (10% versus 16% in the non-trauma and ocular trauma groups, respectively), phthisis (25% versus 12%), hypotony (33% versus 18%), corneal graft end failure (51% in both groups), and secondary glaucoma (18% versus 24%).

Conclusion

In patients with both vitreoretinal and corneal pathology, the use of Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis combined with vitreoretinal surgery and penetrating keratoplasty resulted in improvement of visual acuity, particularly in the groups of ocular trauma and monocular patients. The high rate of retinal reattachment and the low rate of graft rejection was probably related to the use of new vitreoretinal techniques, including retinotomy in selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallemore RP, Bokosky JE (1995) Penetrating keratoplasty with vitreoretinal surgery using Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis: modified technique allowing use of larger corneal grafts. Cornea 14:33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapran K, Ozkaya A, Erdogan G, Karakucuk Y, Gezginaslan TA, Perente I, Taskapili M (2017) Wide-field Landers Keratoprosthesis in various combined corneal and vitreoretinal problems: twelve-month results. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 48:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Landers MB, Foulks GN, Landers DM, Hickingbotham D, Hamilton RC (1981) Temporary keratoprosthesis for use during pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 91:615–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Toth MCA, Landers MB (1993) A new wide-field temporary keratoprosthesis. Retina 13:353–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckardt C (1987) A new temporary keratoprosthesis for pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 7:34–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kompa S, Langefeld S, Kirchhof B, Brenman K, Schrage N (2000) Aachen-Keratoprosthesis as temporary implant. Case report on first clinical application. Int J Artif Organs 23:345–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Langefeld S, Kompa S, Redbrake C, Brenman K, Kirchhof B, Schrage NF (2000) Aachen keratoprosthesis as temporary implant for combined vitreoretinal surgery and keratoplasty: report on 10 clinical applications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:722–726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ikeda T (2001) Pars plana vitrectomy combined with penetrating keratoplasty. Semin Ophthalmol 16:119–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia-Valenzuela E, Blair NP, Shapiro MJ, Gieser JP, Rewnick KI, Solomon MJ, Sugar J (1999) Outcome of vitreoretinal surgery and penetrating keratoplasty using temporary keratoprosthesis. Retina 19:424–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nowomiejska K, Haszcz D, Forlini C, Forlini M, Moneta-Wielgos J, Maciejewski R, Zarnowski T, Juenemann AG, Rejdak R (2015) Wide-field Landers temporary keratoprosthesis in severe ocular trauma: functional and anatomical results after one year. J Ophthalmol 2015:163–675

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khouri AS, Vaccaro A, Zarbin MA, Chu DS (2010) Clinical results with the use of a temporary keratoprosthesis in combined penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 20:885–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan Y, Cui J, Zhang J, Chen S, Xu Y (2006) Penetrating keratoplasty combined with vitreoretinal surgery for severe ocular injury with blood-stained cornea and no light perception. Ophthalmologica 220:186–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Menapace R, Skorpi C, Gras M (1990) Modified triple procedure using temporary keratoprosthesis for closed-system small incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:230–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong X, Wang W, Xie L, Chiu AM-C (2006) Long-term outcome of combined penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery using temporary keratoprosthesis. Eye 20:59–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roters S, Szuman P, Hermes S, Thumann G, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Kirschhof B (2003) Outcome of combined penetrating keratoplasty with vitreoretinal surgery for management of severe ocular injuries. Retina 23:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong FT, Dai RP (2002) The surgical treatment of traumatized eyes with no light perception. Chin J Ophthalmol 38:657–659

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin XF, Wen XY, Wang ZF et al (2000) Vitreoretinal surgery for early traumatized eyes with no light perception. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis 16:251–252

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koenig SB, McDonald HR, William GA, Abrams GW (1986) PKP after placement of a temporary keratoprosthesis during pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 102:45–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boisjoly HM, Tourigny R, Bazin R, Laughrea PA, Dube I (1993) Risk factors of corneal graft failure. Ophthalmology 100:1728–1735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Noorily SW, Foulks GN, McCuen BW (1991) Results of penetrating keratoplasty associates with silicone oil retinal tamponade. Ophthalmology 98:1186–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gross JG, Feldman S, Freeman WR (1990) Combined penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery with the Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmic Surg 21:67–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiedemann P, Konen W, Heimann K (1994) Reconstruction of the anterior and posterior segment of the eye after massive injury. Ger J Ophthalmol 3:84–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frenkel T, Moisseiev E, Neudorfer M, Loewenstein A, Barak A (2015) Comparison of retinal detachment surgery outcome among patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with and without relaxing retinotomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:855–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gelender H, Vaiser A, Snyder WB, Fuller DG, Hutton WL (1988) Temporary keratoprosthesis for combined penetrating keratoplasty, pars plana vitrectomy, and repair of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 95:897–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen HJ, Wang CG, Dou HL, Feng XF, Feng K, Hu YT, Xu YM, Ma ZZ (2014) Anatomical outcome of vitreoretinal surgery using temporary keratoprosthesis and replacement of the trephined corneal button for severe open globe injuries: one-year result. J Ophthalmol 2014:794039. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/794039

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kolomeyer AM, Grigorian RA, Mostafavi D, Bhagat N, Zarbin MA (2011) 360 degrees retinectomy for the treatment of complex retinal detachment. Retina 31:266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sato EA, Shinoda K, Inoue M, Ohtake Y, Kimura I (2008) Reduced choroidal blood flow can induce visual field defect in open angle glaucoma patients without intraocular pressure elevation following encircling scleral buckling. Retina 28:493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Marta Pulido, MD, for editing the manuscript and for her editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Bové Álvarez.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of IMO medical center and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bové Álvarez, M., Arumí, C.G., Distéfano, L. et al. Comparative study of penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery with Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis in ocular trauma versus non-trauma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257, 2547–2558 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04420-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04420-0

Keywords

Navigation